Saving America and America's Economy

With the economic crisis now foremost in American's minds, pushing back their concerns for the ongoing War in Iraq (a manipulated crisis at it's core, occurring just prior to the 2008 elections mind you), below are some suggestions for getting our economy back on track the "old fashioned," way - by abiding by the Constitution. I am concerned with Obama's suggestions, since as a Constitutional lawyer you would think he might consult it with respect to his policy making before making any more of his mesmerizing speeches. But it is clear this Administration is simply another promise of "change" without substance, that much has been clear since the changes in position he has made on both the war, and his economic plans.

1. Rescind the 700 Billion Dollar fraud of a bailout that was rushed through before the American people could become none the wiser, and which was covered up by the mainstream media acting in concert. This bailout was nothing more than a "payback" for those members of Congress, and the two presidential candidates, for their loans for their campaigns, billed at the American people's expense and will result in inflationary taxes that, no matter what pittance is rebated to the American people in the form of a stimulus package will only stimulate the coffers of the government once again in tax revenue. Obviously, the individual Americans had had it with the two party system that has merged essentially into one in defrauding the American people time and time again for their own agendas and purposes. It is called bi-partisanship, but is actually treason against the Constitution. A Ponzi scheme if ever there was one.

Instead:

2.Call in the loans of all countries whose balance sheets are now in the black, and whose currency is thus now also more stable, for all the foreign aid and loans we have made to them while our own economy has sunk in the process. No more foreign aid unless and until America gets some of those loans repaid, with interest.

3. Recall immediately all non-essential service personnel now serving in Iraq, leaving only the career army and diplomatic corp to oversee the arrangement of the transferring of the costs of the rebuilding efforts to their own government, since we were so very gracious in dethroning their latest dictator rather than abiding by the original Congressional Resolution calling for the capture of those strictly responsible for 9/11....Osama bin Laden and all those who directly gave him aid and comfort. The costs of this ongoing frivolous conflict are putting is putting our children and grandchildren's welfare and continued safety at risk, and also their own economic futures. If Mr. Obama cares about his two daughters, I am sure he would see the wisdom in such a position, unless it is his own financial future which is more important, or temporary political legacy as the "winner" of a "no-win" conflict. How can you defeat any enemy whose personal beliefs hold that dying for their jihad earns them their right in heaven. The logic of this continuing war based on that simple premise continues to astound me, and a good many other Americans.

4. Pass effective legislation calling for accountability of the Federal Reserve, and no more independent actions outside the oversight of Congress, per our Constitution that gives Congress, and Congress alone, the power to print and value our currency. Since that provision was unlawfully transferred by the Wilson Administration, then at the very least also provision should have been included to provide for strict regulation and oversight, not our Congress essentially working for them and their agendas. Also, enact sufficient oversight and regulation of those private banks who are recipients also of loans from the Federal Reserve and their policies in their dealings with the public. No more freewheeling and fraudulent bailouts, especially not for global industries, such as AIG.

5. Repeal the 16th Amendment that affords the majority of legislator's time and now a year around Congress to be bribed and forsake their oaths of office to the American people in favor of corporate and global interests and using their tax dollars in order to so do. We are at this point funding the entire world's economy, and tying our economy into that of other nations is how we got to where we are today, in debt and at the mercy of those international bankers.

6. Repeal the 17th Amendment calling for state legislative election of Senators, so that they again have a voice at the federal levels, and are not simply lobbyists at the federal trough for pork bills as another special interest group. No campaign election fraud with respect to the election of Senators, and Constitutional government once again. Institute the provisions that campaign contributions may only be accepted for House members from citizens, not corporate interests, that live in their districts. No outside state or federal funding. You cannot have a government of the people when the representatives serve outside interests, and not the people at all.

7. Since corporations only pay income taxes on their profits, tax them to the hilt. Then maybe those profits will trickle down to either the employees, or into research and development costs in order to protect their investment the old fashioned way - by reinvesting in it rather than the Boards of Directors and upper level management skimming the profits. Institute regulations that call for investor/stockholder approval of all severance and bonus packages to eliminate "golden parachutes." The investors own the company, so should have a say in the compensation for which these top level management employees are entitled and worth. Not them self-determining, in many instances, their own salaries and severance packages.

Those are just a few, but there are so many more Constitutional abridgements which have been enacted, that it would take days to address them all. But those "Lucky 7" would truly be the legal and Constitutional way to reverse what has brought us to this point, at least initially.

American Citizen or "Nativist?"

Last night on Glenn Beck's show I was astounded to hear that the pro-amnesty, pro-open borders crowd has pinned a new label on the opposition, those of us post 9/11 who are calling for much needed border security and fencing, and enforcement through attrition of our immigration laws as both Constitutional duties of our federal government, and national security issues. After all, "common defense" purposes were the actual reason that the federal government was created, and the states "united" to begin with. Having lived and experienced the negative consequences of the last amnesty passed by the Reagan administration, with the costs in both lives and property the border states residents have experienced since then, which is now spreading throughout the nation, this new turn of events speaks volumes on the true Americans vs. globalists who have infiltrated all levels of our government, and the mentality and mindset of those supporting no holds barred immigration and border hopping at will. This term was used during the evaluation of Senator John McCain speech yesterday to LaRaza ("the Race") again paying lip service to border security and enforcement, but seeking apparently this liberal and left wing activists groups support and trust. Arizona's borders still remain open seven years post 9/11, while Senator McCain supports securing Iraq and Israel's borders and was a sponsor for the McCain/Kennedy amnesty two years ago, so it would appear LaRaza has nothing to fear from either candidate that Arizona, New Mexico, California and Texas soon will revert essentially back to the Mexican terroritory it once was. Guess the bureaucracy after the Mexican American war was not much different in their failure to fence and secure those borders back then.

Below is a quote from our Constitution, at Article I, Section 9:

Section. 9. The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congressprior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

It seems to me in a quick analysis, our framers and founding fathers were also nativists. The Constitution was ratified in 1790, and this provision would mean that those founders "posterity" born after it's ratification would then be natural born U.S. citizens and 18 years old, old enough to begin setting up their own households and businesses. It is clear that the founders never intended to tax the wages of natural born or naturalized citizens, but did intend to discourage hiring foreign workers instead and tax THEIR labors (although I'm sure by leaving the door open in Congress being then allowed to prohibit such importations after 1808 or set higher costs or restrictions, knew that there at times would be a need for "seasonal" workers).

Does appear that our two presumptive candidates could make a home run in taking on this issue, in this uncertain economy where Americans are truly hurting due to both the out-sourcing and in-sourcing of the large corporate global concerns doing business in this country. Maybe since both are pro-amnesty backers, they would be open then to repealing the 16th Amendment on the American people, and instead tax those foreign workers as the founders intended.

The way it is now, amnesty or no, with the privileges and immunities they now have over and above even first, second or third generation Americans (no income taxes, ACLU and taxpayer paid defense costs, rights in many states to even initiate and bring civil actions in U.S. courts, U.S. taxpayer paid medical and health care benefits), why would any of these "guest workers" or illegals actually want to become Americans. There is really no incentive for them, especially in the sanctuary cities and states who are globally controlled. Nor is it advantageous to the corporations in this country also, since they are by and large day labors and contract labor and as salaried or hourly workers and U.S. citizens, would then be subject to paying at the least their share of the health benefits in the form of at least Workmen's Comp insurance,their share of social security withholding, etc.). It appears it is the government itself behind the amnesty hiding behind the public position that it is the "wish" of the corporations and militant illegal immigrant groups - whose main interests are not the amnesty at all, but in making sure those borders remain unsecured so they continue to have a pool of workers at minimal cost, and as LaRaza, increase and promote their Mexico/U.S. global and racial agenda.

Interesting in how even being proud to be an American, and believer in our intended form of government, can turn into a "spin" in now being labeled as "nativists."

If Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson were nativists, guess that's good enough for me.

Republican? Democrat? How About Global Corporate Communist?

Now that we are almost two years into this travesty of a selection of the next President or Commander in Chief of our nation, with the degree of dissatisfaction now running rampant amongst the American people with the Bush Administration and our current Congress, please indulge me for a few moments in highlighting what I feel has happened to our government and state and national offices..............In a few simple words, a "corporate takeover."

It seems the two mainstream political parties have emerged as one.....the Global Corporate Communist Party of America, or the GCPA. The GCPA are, first and foremost, globalists in their mindset and also no more than corporate lackeys for their true constituents, the corporate "person hoods" of their beneficiaries. The GCPA party does not read, nor acknowledge, their enumerated powers, under both the U.S. or their own state constitutions, rather their private and public benefactors and interests and political careers. They use the public purse as an open wallet to distribute nobilities and honors (and cash) on their favored subjects. They collect the tax revenue, and then ignore their enumerated powers and limits in favor of power and prestige. They hire chefs for the House Dining Room at the taxpayers expense (Ms. Pelosi), or wage wars on foreign soil for their own personal oil interests (Bush). They institute "sobriety checkpoints" or "insurance checkpoints" (unlawful searches and seizures) in the name of public safety. They authorize strip searching at airports (another unlawful search and seizure) rather than securing the U.S. borders from unlawful invasion after the travesty and civilian loss of life of 9/11 (a clear, retaliatory action for the Globalist agenda in our errant foreign policies in the Middle East these many years, as verified by the 9/11 report, and carried out against innocent civilians while our government and leadership stripped Americans further of their Constitutional rights after their own ineptitude and negligence purportedly in the interests of national security.

While our leadership sells out both American jobs and industry to foreign interests, a private wedding is held at the ranch in Crawford, Texas where, in order to maintain 'privacy' airspace is restricted for 30 miles over the ranch. Meanwhile, everyday Americans are wiretapped and stripped searched, with no privacy rights to speak of - who are paying the salaries for most of the 'guests' of the Crawford gala.While political correctness in the media, another beneficiary of the CPA and their own conglomerate governmental contracts is deluding the public as to the extent of the true crime and corruption within a system that has become corrupted from within, and not in any way, shape or form the intended 'government' the founder's fought and died for.

If the US does not lose the West and Southwest to the Mexicans eventually due to our failure to secure that border after the Mexican American war, we will lose it and the rest of the nation to the GCPA the Global Corporate Communist Party of America, and their "one world governance " communistic agenda.

Constitutional Rewind (Part One)

In all the rhetoric and political posturing which has now gone on for almost two years, with the exception of one candidate who was stifled by the media for some true 'straight talk,' and the reasons for why our country is now in an endless war, economically crippled, with citizens losing their homes, without some now even able to afford the gas to get to some of their places of employment, it has amazed me that none of the main stream media in their questioning have asked the most important question. Do you plan to lead this country abiding by the oath upon which you swear your allegiance, and which grants you your powers - the U.S. Constitution?As far as issues go, after this abysmal excuse of a president and Congress, I think that is the number one question that should be asked, as it really would answer all others. The war, economy, immigration situation, campaign reform, literally everything....What would our country look like if we returned to it's roots, and did a Constitutional rewind?

1. The War in Iraq would be over, and would have never begun. The 'Act of Piracy' committed by these extremist Muslims who admitted responsibility would have been limited to just those who were directly responsible, and any and all giving them aid and comfort until the perpetrators could be captured. The focus would have remained on Osama bin Laden as the admitted 'mastermind' to the tragedy of 9/11. Our borders would have been immediately secured prior to any of our forces setting foot in Afghanistan, as an internal attack, and any and all individuals now in this country under visa status, who had not attained lawful citizenship, or without American sponsors, would have been ordered out of the country until stricter immigration policies could be enacted, and our borders adequately secured (as they should have been years and years ago, as the federal government's PRIMARY duty under the Constitution, after all). A country without borders nor border protection, is really no country at all.

2. There would be no federal income tax. Monies to operate the federal government would be gained by trade agreements, and taxation on outsourced labor or materials. American jobs and the economy would be protected, and Americans would have more to spend to stimulate that economy. The 'tax on labor' would be a 'tax' on foreign labor, or foreign products to protect 'domestic' products, and the citizens 'right to life, liberty and happiness.' The President, Congress and Supreme Court would be paid 'a compensation' in line with their 'civil servant' status, and not private jets, federal pension plans, fine dining, travel expenses, health and dental insurance, etc., etc. Due to the being forced to abide by the constraints in the Constitution, Congressional sessions would not be full year sessions, and the Senators and Representatives would actually spend the majority of their time in their home state among the citizens in order to truly be representatives of them, and not their 'corporate' political parties.

3. The fantasy of 'corporate person-hood' would be removed, as there really is only three 'legal' entities in the U.S. Constitution, the federal government, the state government, and the citizens. Corporations have no rights, and especially have no Bill of Rights protections, as was illegally extended to them by the U.S. Supreme Court way back when (when the Supreme Court has no legal authority to rewrite or amend the Constitution at all, merely interpret it AS WRITTEN, not creating another 'party' to it, nor inserting words or redefining meanings according to their whims, but according to the common useage language, and also the 'intent' of the founders when writing it). Once corporate person-hood is removed, then the tainting of our government with corporate political donations and 'commercial' corporate lobbyists becomes benign, as they do not exist with respect to having any impact on legislation whatsoever.

Just these three simple 'rewinds' would put the country back into the hands of the people, to whom it belongs.